El Banco de Durango

The bank was founded on 6 September 1890 by Carlos Bracho and Juan González Asunsolo with a capitalisation of $500,000 and began operating on 1 June 1891. The original shareholders and their holdings were as follows:

Following the Ley General de Instituciones de Crédito on 18 September 1897 the bank modified its concession and was given five years in which to withdraw all its $1 notes.

The bank’s first premises were at 2ª calle de Teresas (today calle Juárez) 14, a property owned by Toribio Bracho de la Bárcena, one of the main shareholders. This proved insufficient so on 1 January 1904 the bank moved into new premises on the corner of calle Constitución and calle Mayor (now calle 20 de Noviembre). "The building which is being erected at Durango for the Banco de Durango, is said to be one which, when finished, will not be excelled by any other bank building of the republic. The building will be two stories, the lower one being entirely devoted to the bank’s offices, arrange in the most commodious and convenient way. There is a large burglar and fire proof vault. The outside is of Renaissance architecture, with pretty railings for the windows and balconies. The upper storey is to be the residence of Manager Francisco Asunsolo, who is also a stockholder. This building, which will cost about $200,000 will contribute largely to the beauty of Durango. It will be entirely finished within six months"^{The Mexican Herald, 14 March 1903}.

The bank opened a branch in Gómez Palacio on 20 February 1904^{letter of Carlos Bracho, 17 February 1904 in Memorias de las Instituciones de Crédito correspondientes á los años de 1904-1906, tomo III. The Junta de Vigilancia was composed of Pedro Torres Saldaña, Sigfrido Buchanan and Pedro Alvarez, the manager was Luis Gurza Vergara and the Cajero-contador Antonio Rivas Castillo}.

American Bank Note Company print runs

The American Bank Note Company produced the following notes. It engraved two special vignettes in December 1890: a view of the cathedral (C 420) for the $10 note and the Cerro de Mercado (C 419) for the $20 note, adding a train to the original view.

Originally the series letter was engraved on all the plates but from 1899 it was typographed.

A new order (F 135) was placed in November 1902.

On 3 February 1906 the bank approved a new order (F 788) of notes, to be delivered to their agents in New York, Müller, Schall & Co.^{ABNC, folder 169, Banco de Durango (1906-1931)}. On 23 April the notes were ready and Müller, Schall & Co. instructed the ABNC to ship them to the Banco Mercantil de Veracruz, Veracruz, from where they would be forwarded^ibid..

In July 1907 the bank sent the ABNC a $10 note (Serie [ ] 00322, which had changed colour, with a different tint on the face, and said that there were other similar notes in circulation. The ABNC replied that this was a security measure. “If you will carefully examine one of these ten dollar notes, you will notice that the orange tint which is spread over all of the face, has a distinct pattern, although same is not very apparent. This orange tint is put on with the idea of security against counterfeiting by photography, and the note which you sent us proves its efficacy. Someone, evidently with the idea of obliterating this protective tint, so that they would be able to secure a clear photographic reproduction of the black work, has subjected the note to a bath of, say, sulpher, but has only succeeded in changing the color from orange to black, which brings out much more distinctly the [ ]oid pattern of the tint. The same chemical action has taken place with the orange back, changing the color to the brown as it now appears.”^ibid.. 

In October 1910 the bank wrote that they wanted to make a new issue but, having found by experience that the $50 and $100 were too large, asked the cost of changing the $10, $50 and $100 plates to the size of the $20 note. On receiving the ABNC’s reply, they answered that as the $10 was so similar in size to the $20, they had decided to change just the $50 and $100 notes. The bank also noted that the paper previously used was thicker than necessary, and asked for it to the changed to that used in printing the $50 Banco Nacional de Mexico notes. The bank placed the new order (F 2732) on 24 November 1910^ibid. and the next month the ABNC engraved new face plates for the $50 and $100 notes,  slightly smaller than the previous ones.

On 31 March 1911 ABNC advised that the notes were ready and asked for shipping instructions, but the bank replied that as communications were uncertain and it would be dangerous to ship documents of value, it asked for the ABNC to hold on to them^ibid.. It was until 27 January 1913, nearly two year later, that than bank thought it was time to receive the notes. They were sent to Veracruz by the steamer Mexico on 6 February 1913, but because of the lack of documentation the customs refused them and on 1 April the bank asked for them to be sent to the Banco Central Mexicano(footnote}ibid..

On 24 November 1913, just after Huerta’s relaxed the restrictions of the Ley General de Insitituciones de Crédito, the bank asked for a quote of 50,000 and 100,000 $1 notes, similar to their pre-1897 issue. On 12 January 1914 the bank ordered 50,000 $1 notes, Series G, and on 17 January ordered 20,000 $20, 6,000 $50 and 3,000 $100 notes, Series H^ibid. On 23 January the bank asked that the $5 note have two sets of serial number, so the text “PAGARÁ Á LA VISTA AL PORTADOR EN MONEDA DE PLATA” was moved.

On 11 February 1914 the ABNC shipped via the steamer “Mexico” a box containing 8,000 $20 (H 00001-08000) and 3,500 $50 (H 0001-3500) and on 19 February shipped via S.S. “Monterey” 12,000 $20 (H 08001-20000) and 2,500 $50 (H 3501-6000. On 26 February it shipped via S.S. “Morrow Castle” 2,000 $1 (C 1-12000) and 3,000 $100 (H 0001-3000). On 3 March it shipped via the steamer “Esperanza” 38,000 $1 (C 12001-50000), completing the order.

On 31 October 1913 the bank had asked the ABNC to prepare models for a $500 note, leaving the design to the ABNC’s discretion but making use of a photograph of the bank’s building which was enclosed. However, this first request was lost in the post. The ABNC started work on models in February 1914, with a special vignette of the bank building (C 1376) and sent complete face and back models on 16 February. These were approved on 6 March, with a slight change of “en efectivo” in place of “en moneda de plata”. The bank ordered 3,000 notes^{ABNC, ibid. Also AGN, SC226 Comisión Monetaria, caja 104 statement from ABNC, 6 February 1931}.

On 27 March 1914 the bank made its final order (F 4111) of ABNC notes, in six denominations, including adding an extra 1,000 $500 notes (A 3001-4000)^{ABNC, ibid. Also AGN, SC226 Comisión Monetaria, caja 104 statement from ABNC, 6 February 1931}.

There was a brief hiccough when on 21 April the company stopped work on the $5 notes (order F 4142) but continued with $10, $20, $50 and $100 notes (orders F 4143 and F 4144). The factory was ordered to finish engraving the face and back dies for the $500 (orders F4111 and F4144) but not to print until further notice. This was done because the ABNC did not think conditions in Mexico supported going ahead. The go-ahead on the $5 and $500 was notes was then given on 4 May.

On 21 May ABNC shipped via S.S. “Guantanamo” 25,000 $10 (J. 00001-250000, 12,500 $20 (J 00001-12500), 4,000 $50 (J. 0001-40000 and 5,500 $100 (J. 0001-5500) this time consigned to the Wells Fargo agent at Veracruz, as Wells Fargo & Co. Express would not take any freight for points beyond the port of entry. On 9 July ABNC shipped via S.S. “Guantanamo” 50,000 $5 (J. 00001-500000).

The $500 notes took longer but the 4,000 notes (A. 0001-4000) were shipped via the S. S. “Morro Castle” on 13 August.

The bank owed $1,117.80 to the ABNC and on 19 September 1914 the Resident Agent reported “The Manager of this bank informs me that as we did not fulfil our promise as to delivery the notes are are at present no use to them, and that although the bank acknowledges the account he wished me to give them a little longer time in which to pay, more especially as the rate of exchange is so bad and they have no funds in New York. He further explained that they had received no news about the receipt of the notes in Veracruz. After a long talk with him I got a promise that they would make payment in full as soon as they received the notes or had more definite information that the notes had reached Veracruz. I therefore wrote at once to the Agent of the Wells Fargo Express Company at Veracruz asking if he had the notes in his possession. As soon as I receive his answer I will be in a position to settle this account”^{ABNC, folder 169, Banco de Durango (1906-1931)}. This amount was still outstanding in November 1929, when the bank wrote they had never received the notes covered by this invoice. The resident Agent therefore wrote to the Wells Fargo agency in Mexico City, in the hope of proving that all the notes had been received by the bank but was told that Wells Fargo could not give him any information relating to the receipt of the notes for their files only covered ten years back^ibid..In February 1931 the Comité Liquidador de los Bancos Antiguos de Emisión, in acknowledging the ABNC’s claim, decided that the evidence showed that the notes had been received by the bank but, any way, the invoices were to delivery F.O.B. New York, with shipping at the bank’s risk.
The plates used in printing the notes^{Order F 9467, The plates were:
1 plate  – 1 Peso – face
1     “     – 1    “    – back
2 plates – 1    “    – tint
1 plate   – 5 Pesos – face
1     “      – 5     “    – back
2 plates  – 5     “    – tint
2     “      – 10 Pesos – face
2     “      – 10   “      – back
2     “      – 10   “      – tint
2     “      – 20 Pesos – face
2     “      – 20   “      – back
2     “      – 20   “      – tint
2     “      – 50 Pesos – face
2     “      – 50   “      – back
4     “      – 50   “      – tint
2     “    – 100 Pesos – face
2     “    – 100   “      – back
4     “    – 100   “      – tint
1 plate  – 500 Pesos – face
1 “         – 500   “      – back
2 plates – 500   “      – tint} were cancelled on 19 October 1931.

At the beginning of April 1913 Gustavo Sáens de Sicilia was named Interventor by Huerta in substitution for Emiliano G. Saravia. He was to have taken up his appointment as soon as communications were restored with the city, but they never were, so he operated from Mexico City^{Figaro, Tomo I, Núm. 29, 3 April 1913}.

On 26 July 1913 the Jefe del Estado Mayor of the Tercera Brigada, Mayor Felíx Puron, asked for permission to appoint José Martínez R., who had been employed by the Banco Nacional de México when it set up in Durango, as Interventor since the former Interventor had left the city, but was told that was a matter for the Gobierno General^{ADUR, Fondo Secretaria General de Gobierno (Siglo XX), Sección 6 Gobierno, Serie 6.7 Correspondencia, caja 6, nombre 8}. However, following Carranza’s ultimatum to the banks in his area, on 24 February 1914 Pastor Rouaix took possession of the Banco de Durango and Banco Nacional de México^{El Demócrata, 25 February 1914} and ordered Leonardo Pescador and Carlos G. Saravia to carry out a detailed inventory^{ADUR, Libro Copiador 267, Hacienda 11 July 1913 - 25 April 1914, pp.811-815}. The branch of the Banco de Durango in Gómez Palacio was taken over by Coronel Mateo Almanza, Jefe de Confiscaciones, in April 1914^{ADUR, Libro Copiador 314, Telegramas 7 December 1915 - 15 January 1918, p119}.

Bouligny & Schmidt issues

In May 1914 Bouligny and Schmidt produced $5 and $10 notes. The bank had only just received 25,000 $10 notes from the ABNC, which demonstrates how quickly the number of banknotes in circulation grew.

Insolvency

Due to the revolution the bank closed its doors in October 1914. Following the establishment of the Comisión Reguladora e Inspectora de Instituciones de Crédito its Inspector, Rafael Herrera y Lasso, interviewed the bank’s manager, Manuel de Urquidi, at their lawyer’s offices in Mexico City on 3 December 1915. As the bank could not produce the required documentation about its financial status, the Comisión declared its concession invalid.

Under Obregón's decree of 31 January 1921 the bank was placed into Class A (for banks whose assets were greater than their liabilities) and allowed to resume all customary operations except the issue of bank notes.The bank was finally liquidated in 1930.